Michael Ejercito
2016-11-24 18:39:14 UTC
France on the Verge of Total Collapse
by Guy Millière
November 24, 2016 at 6:30 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9363/france-collapse
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and
the trap is now closing.
In the 1970s, the Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and
France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At
the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world,
evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. France's Muslim
population has since grown in numbers while failing to assimilate.
Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of
Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French
Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they
would like to see erased from the face of earth.
"It is better to leave than flee." -- Sammy Ghozlan, President of the
National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism. He was later mugged, and
his car was torched. He left.
Villiers also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of thousands of weapons
of war. He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used; the
Islamists have already won.
Originally, France's dreams might have been of displacing America as a world
power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic
states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism.
France is in turmoil. "Migrants" arriving from Africa and the Middle East
sow disorder and insecurity in many cities. The huge slum commonly known as
the "jungle of Calais" has just been dismantled, but other slums are being
created each day. In eastern Paris, streets have been covered with
corrugated sheets, oilcloth and disjointed boards. Violence is commonplace.
France's 572 "no-go zones," officially defined as "sensitive urban areas",
continue to grow, and police officers who approach them often suffer the
consequences. Recently, a police car drove into an ambush and was torched
while the police were prevented from getting out. If attacked, police
officers are told by their superiors to flee rather than retaliate. Many
police officers, angry at having to behave like cowards, have organized
demonstrations. No terrorist attacks have taken place since the slaughter of
a priest in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on July 26, 2016, but intelligence
services see that jihadists have returned from the Middle East and are ready
to act, and that riots may break out anywhere, any time, on any pretext.
Although overwhelmed by a domestic situation it barely controls, the French
government still intervenes in the world affairs: a "Palestinian state" is
still its favorite cause, Israel its favorite scapegoat.
Last Spring, even though both France and the Palestinian territories were in
terrible shape, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault anyway declared
that it was "urgent" to relaunch the "peace process" and create a
Palestinian state. France therefore convened an international conference,
held in Paris on June 3. Neither Israel nor the Palestinians were invited to
it. The conference was a flop. It concluded with a vapid statement about the
"imperative necessity" to go "forward."
France did not stop there. The government then decided to organize a new
conference in December. This time, with Israel and the Palestinians.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, noting that Israel does not need
intermediaries, refused the invitation. Palestinian leaders accepted. Saeb
Erekat, the Palestinian Authority spokesman congratulated France, adding,
not surprisingly, that the Palestinian Authority had "suggested" the idea to
the French.
Now Donald Trump is the U.S. president-elect, and Newt Gingrich is likely to
play a key role in the Trump Administration. Gingrich said a few years ago
that there is no such a thing as a Palestinian people, and added last week
that settlements are in no way an obstacle to peace. As such, the December
conference looks as if it might be another failure.
French diplomats nevertheless are working with Palestinian officials on a UN
resolution to recognize a Palestinian State inside the "1967 borders" (the
1949 armistice lines), but without any peace treaty. They are apparently
hoping that outgoing U.S. President Barack Obama will not use the American
veto at the Security Council, allowing the passage of the resolution. It is
not certain at all that Barack Obama will want to end his presidency on a
gesture so openly subversive. It is almost certain that France will fail
there too. Again.
For many years, France seems to have built its entire foreign policy on
aligning itself with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): 56
Islamic countries plus the Palestinians. Originally, France's dreams might
have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil,
business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic
terrorism. All four have been washouts. It is also obvious that France has
more urgent problems to solve.
France persists because it is desperately trying to limit problems that
probably cannot be solved.
In the 1950s, France was different from what it is now. It was a friend of
Israel. The "Palestinian cause" did not exist. The war in Algeria was
raging, and a large majority of French politicians would not even have
shaken hands with unrepentant terrorists.
Everything changed with the end of the Algerian war. Charles de Gaulle
handed Algeria over to a terrorist movement called the National Liberation
Front. He then proceeded to create a strategic reorientation of the France's
foreign policy, unveiling what he called the "Arab policy of France."
France signed trade and military agreements with various Arab dictatorships.
To seduce its new friends, it eagerly adopted an anti-Israel policy. When,
in the 1970s, terrorism in the form of airplane hijackings was invented by
the Palestinians, and with the murder of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich
Olympics, "the Palestinians" all at once became a "sacred cause" and a
useful tool for leverage in the Arab world, France, adopting the "cause,"
became rigidly pro-Palestinian.
The Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to
accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time,
France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as
part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. The Muslim population has since grown
in numbers, while failing to assimilate.
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and
the trap is now closing.
France's Muslim population seems anti-French in terms of Judeo-Christian,
Enlightenment values, and pro-French only to the extent that France submits
to the demands of Islam. As France's Muslims are also pro-Palestinian,
theoretically there should have been no problem. But France underestimated
the effects of the rise of extremist Islam in the Muslim world and beyond.
More and more, French Muslims consider themselves Muslim first. Many claim
that the West is at war with Islam; they see France and Israel as part of
the West, so they are at war with them both. They see that France is
anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian, but they also see that several French
politicians maintain ties with Israel, so they likely think that France is
not anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian enough.
They see that France tolerates Palestinian terrorism, and seem not to
understand why France would fight Islamic terrorism in other places.
To please its Muslims, the French government may believe it has no choice
other than to be as pro-Palestinian and as anti-Israel as possible -- even
though it looks as if this policy is failing badly in the polls.
The French government undoubtedly sees that it cannot prevent what
increasingly looks like a looming disaster. This disaster is already taking
place.
Perhaps France's current government is hoping that it might delay the
disaster a bit and avoid a civil war. Perhaps, they might hope, the "no go
zones" will not explode -- at least on their watch.
France today has six million Muslims, 10% of its population, and the
percentage is growing. Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the
full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming
majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against
Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.
The leading French Muslim organization, the Union of Islamic Organizations
of France, is the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement that
should be listed as a terrorist organization for its open wishes to
overthrow Western governments.
The Muslim Brotherhood is primarily financed by Qatar, a country that
invests heavily in France -- and that has the comfort of its very own U.S.
airbase.
Jews are leaving France in record numbers, and these departures do not stop.
Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against
Anti-Semitism, repeated for many years that, "It is better to leave than
flee." He was mugged. His car was torched. He left, and now lives in Israel.
The rest of the French population clearly sees the extreme seriousness of
what is happening. Some of them are angry and in a state of revolt; others
seem resigned to the worst: an Islamist takeover of Europe.
The next French elections will take place in May 2017. French President
François Hollande has lost all credibility and has no chance of being
reelected. Whoever comes to power will have a difficult task.
The French seem to have lost confidence in Nicolas Sarkozy, so they will
probably choose between Marine Le Pen, Alain Juppé or François Fillon.
Marine Le Pen is the candidate of the far-right National Front.
Alain Juppé is the mayor of Bordeaux, and often campaigns in the company of
Tareq Oubrou, imam of the city. Until recently, Tareq Oubrou was a member of
the Muslim Brotherhood. Alain Juppé seems to believe that the present
disorder will calm down if France fully submits.
François Fillon will probably be the moderate-right candidate. He recently
said that "Islamic sectarianism" creates "problems in France." He also said
that if a Palestinian State is not created very soon, Israel will be "the
main threat to world peace."
Three years ago, the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut published a book,
The Unhappy Identity (L'identité malheureuse), describing the dangers
inherent in the Islamization of France and the major disorders that stem
from it. Juppé chose a campaign slogan intended to contradict Finkielkraut:
"The Happy Identity".
Since the publication of Alain Finkielkraut's book, other pessimistic books
have been published that became best-sellers in France. In October 2014,
columnist Eric Zemmour published The French Suicide (Le suicide français). A
few weeks ago, he published another book, A Five-Year Term for Nothing (Un
quinquennat pour rien). He describes what he sees happening to France:
"invasion, colonization, explosion."
Zemmour defines the arrival of millions of Muslims in France during the last
five decades as an invasion, and the recent arrival of hordes of migrants as
the continuation of that invasion. He depicts the creation of "no-go zones"
as the creation of Islamic territories on French soil and an integral part
of a colonization process.
He writes that the eruptions of violence that spread are signs of an
imminent explosion; that sooner or later, revolt will gain ground.
Another book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow? (Les cloches
sonneront-elles encore demain?), was recently published by a former member
of the French government, Philippe de Villiers.
Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their
replacement by mosques. He also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of
thousands of weapons of war (AK-47 assault rifles, Tokarev pistols, M80
Zolja anti-tank weapons, etc). He adds that weapons will probably not even
have to be used -- the Islamists have already won.
In his new book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow?, Philippe de Villiers
notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by
mosques. Pictured above: On August 3, French riot police dragged a priest
and his congregation from the church of St Rita in Paris, prior to its
scheduled demolition. Front National leader Marine Le Pen said in fury: "And
what if they built parking lots in the place of Salafist mosques, and not of
our churches?" (Image source: RT video screenshot)
On November 13, 2016, France marked the first anniversary of the Paris
attacks. Plaques were unveiled every place where people were killed. The
plaques read: "In memory of the injured and murdered victims of the
attacks." No mention was made of jihadist barbarity. In the evening, the
Bataclan Theater reopened with a concert by Sting. The last song of the
concert was "Insh' Allah": "if Allah wills." The Bataclan management
prevented two members of the US band Eagles of Death Metal -- who were on
stage when the attack started -- from entering the concert. A few weeks
after the attack, Jesse Hughes, lead singer of the group, had dared to
criticize the Muslims involved. The Bataclan's director said about Hughes,
"There are things you cannot forgive."
Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of
27 books on France and Europe.
by Guy Millière
November 24, 2016 at 6:30 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9363/france-collapse
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and
the trap is now closing.
In the 1970s, the Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and
France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At
the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world,
evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. France's Muslim
population has since grown in numbers while failing to assimilate.
Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of
Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French
Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they
would like to see erased from the face of earth.
"It is better to leave than flee." -- Sammy Ghozlan, President of the
National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism. He was later mugged, and
his car was torched. He left.
Villiers also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of thousands of weapons
of war. He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used; the
Islamists have already won.
Originally, France's dreams might have been of displacing America as a world
power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic
states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism.
France is in turmoil. "Migrants" arriving from Africa and the Middle East
sow disorder and insecurity in many cities. The huge slum commonly known as
the "jungle of Calais" has just been dismantled, but other slums are being
created each day. In eastern Paris, streets have been covered with
corrugated sheets, oilcloth and disjointed boards. Violence is commonplace.
France's 572 "no-go zones," officially defined as "sensitive urban areas",
continue to grow, and police officers who approach them often suffer the
consequences. Recently, a police car drove into an ambush and was torched
while the police were prevented from getting out. If attacked, police
officers are told by their superiors to flee rather than retaliate. Many
police officers, angry at having to behave like cowards, have organized
demonstrations. No terrorist attacks have taken place since the slaughter of
a priest in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on July 26, 2016, but intelligence
services see that jihadists have returned from the Middle East and are ready
to act, and that riots may break out anywhere, any time, on any pretext.
Although overwhelmed by a domestic situation it barely controls, the French
government still intervenes in the world affairs: a "Palestinian state" is
still its favorite cause, Israel its favorite scapegoat.
Last Spring, even though both France and the Palestinian territories were in
terrible shape, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault anyway declared
that it was "urgent" to relaunch the "peace process" and create a
Palestinian state. France therefore convened an international conference,
held in Paris on June 3. Neither Israel nor the Palestinians were invited to
it. The conference was a flop. It concluded with a vapid statement about the
"imperative necessity" to go "forward."
France did not stop there. The government then decided to organize a new
conference in December. This time, with Israel and the Palestinians.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, noting that Israel does not need
intermediaries, refused the invitation. Palestinian leaders accepted. Saeb
Erekat, the Palestinian Authority spokesman congratulated France, adding,
not surprisingly, that the Palestinian Authority had "suggested" the idea to
the French.
Now Donald Trump is the U.S. president-elect, and Newt Gingrich is likely to
play a key role in the Trump Administration. Gingrich said a few years ago
that there is no such a thing as a Palestinian people, and added last week
that settlements are in no way an obstacle to peace. As such, the December
conference looks as if it might be another failure.
French diplomats nevertheless are working with Palestinian officials on a UN
resolution to recognize a Palestinian State inside the "1967 borders" (the
1949 armistice lines), but without any peace treaty. They are apparently
hoping that outgoing U.S. President Barack Obama will not use the American
veto at the Security Council, allowing the passage of the resolution. It is
not certain at all that Barack Obama will want to end his presidency on a
gesture so openly subversive. It is almost certain that France will fail
there too. Again.
For many years, France seems to have built its entire foreign policy on
aligning itself with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): 56
Islamic countries plus the Palestinians. Originally, France's dreams might
have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil,
business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic
terrorism. All four have been washouts. It is also obvious that France has
more urgent problems to solve.
France persists because it is desperately trying to limit problems that
probably cannot be solved.
In the 1950s, France was different from what it is now. It was a friend of
Israel. The "Palestinian cause" did not exist. The war in Algeria was
raging, and a large majority of French politicians would not even have
shaken hands with unrepentant terrorists.
Everything changed with the end of the Algerian war. Charles de Gaulle
handed Algeria over to a terrorist movement called the National Liberation
Front. He then proceeded to create a strategic reorientation of the France's
foreign policy, unveiling what he called the "Arab policy of France."
France signed trade and military agreements with various Arab dictatorships.
To seduce its new friends, it eagerly adopted an anti-Israel policy. When,
in the 1970s, terrorism in the form of airplane hijackings was invented by
the Palestinians, and with the murder of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich
Olympics, "the Palestinians" all at once became a "sacred cause" and a
useful tool for leverage in the Arab world, France, adopting the "cause,"
became rigidly pro-Palestinian.
The Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to
accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time,
France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as
part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. The Muslim population has since grown
in numbers, while failing to assimilate.
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and
the trap is now closing.
France's Muslim population seems anti-French in terms of Judeo-Christian,
Enlightenment values, and pro-French only to the extent that France submits
to the demands of Islam. As France's Muslims are also pro-Palestinian,
theoretically there should have been no problem. But France underestimated
the effects of the rise of extremist Islam in the Muslim world and beyond.
More and more, French Muslims consider themselves Muslim first. Many claim
that the West is at war with Islam; they see France and Israel as part of
the West, so they are at war with them both. They see that France is
anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian, but they also see that several French
politicians maintain ties with Israel, so they likely think that France is
not anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian enough.
They see that France tolerates Palestinian terrorism, and seem not to
understand why France would fight Islamic terrorism in other places.
To please its Muslims, the French government may believe it has no choice
other than to be as pro-Palestinian and as anti-Israel as possible -- even
though it looks as if this policy is failing badly in the polls.
The French government undoubtedly sees that it cannot prevent what
increasingly looks like a looming disaster. This disaster is already taking
place.
Perhaps France's current government is hoping that it might delay the
disaster a bit and avoid a civil war. Perhaps, they might hope, the "no go
zones" will not explode -- at least on their watch.
France today has six million Muslims, 10% of its population, and the
percentage is growing. Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the
full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming
majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against
Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.
The leading French Muslim organization, the Union of Islamic Organizations
of France, is the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement that
should be listed as a terrorist organization for its open wishes to
overthrow Western governments.
The Muslim Brotherhood is primarily financed by Qatar, a country that
invests heavily in France -- and that has the comfort of its very own U.S.
airbase.
Jews are leaving France in record numbers, and these departures do not stop.
Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against
Anti-Semitism, repeated for many years that, "It is better to leave than
flee." He was mugged. His car was torched. He left, and now lives in Israel.
The rest of the French population clearly sees the extreme seriousness of
what is happening. Some of them are angry and in a state of revolt; others
seem resigned to the worst: an Islamist takeover of Europe.
The next French elections will take place in May 2017. French President
François Hollande has lost all credibility and has no chance of being
reelected. Whoever comes to power will have a difficult task.
The French seem to have lost confidence in Nicolas Sarkozy, so they will
probably choose between Marine Le Pen, Alain Juppé or François Fillon.
Marine Le Pen is the candidate of the far-right National Front.
Alain Juppé is the mayor of Bordeaux, and often campaigns in the company of
Tareq Oubrou, imam of the city. Until recently, Tareq Oubrou was a member of
the Muslim Brotherhood. Alain Juppé seems to believe that the present
disorder will calm down if France fully submits.
François Fillon will probably be the moderate-right candidate. He recently
said that "Islamic sectarianism" creates "problems in France." He also said
that if a Palestinian State is not created very soon, Israel will be "the
main threat to world peace."
Three years ago, the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut published a book,
The Unhappy Identity (L'identité malheureuse), describing the dangers
inherent in the Islamization of France and the major disorders that stem
from it. Juppé chose a campaign slogan intended to contradict Finkielkraut:
"The Happy Identity".
Since the publication of Alain Finkielkraut's book, other pessimistic books
have been published that became best-sellers in France. In October 2014,
columnist Eric Zemmour published The French Suicide (Le suicide français). A
few weeks ago, he published another book, A Five-Year Term for Nothing (Un
quinquennat pour rien). He describes what he sees happening to France:
"invasion, colonization, explosion."
Zemmour defines the arrival of millions of Muslims in France during the last
five decades as an invasion, and the recent arrival of hordes of migrants as
the continuation of that invasion. He depicts the creation of "no-go zones"
as the creation of Islamic territories on French soil and an integral part
of a colonization process.
He writes that the eruptions of violence that spread are signs of an
imminent explosion; that sooner or later, revolt will gain ground.
Another book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow? (Les cloches
sonneront-elles encore demain?), was recently published by a former member
of the French government, Philippe de Villiers.
Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their
replacement by mosques. He also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of
thousands of weapons of war (AK-47 assault rifles, Tokarev pistols, M80
Zolja anti-tank weapons, etc). He adds that weapons will probably not even
have to be used -- the Islamists have already won.
In his new book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow?, Philippe de Villiers
notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by
mosques. Pictured above: On August 3, French riot police dragged a priest
and his congregation from the church of St Rita in Paris, prior to its
scheduled demolition. Front National leader Marine Le Pen said in fury: "And
what if they built parking lots in the place of Salafist mosques, and not of
our churches?" (Image source: RT video screenshot)
On November 13, 2016, France marked the first anniversary of the Paris
attacks. Plaques were unveiled every place where people were killed. The
plaques read: "In memory of the injured and murdered victims of the
attacks." No mention was made of jihadist barbarity. In the evening, the
Bataclan Theater reopened with a concert by Sting. The last song of the
concert was "Insh' Allah": "if Allah wills." The Bataclan management
prevented two members of the US band Eagles of Death Metal -- who were on
stage when the attack started -- from entering the concert. A few weeks
after the attack, Jesse Hughes, lead singer of the group, had dared to
criticize the Muslims involved. The Bataclan's director said about Hughes,
"There are things you cannot forgive."
Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of
27 books on France and Europe.