Michael Ejercito
2017-05-18 16:24:53 UTC
France: The Ideology of Islamic Victimization
by Yves Mamou
May 18, 2017 at 5:00 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10134/france-islamic-victimization
They are not the victims of any racist system -- it does not exist -- but
they are the victims of an ideology of victimization, which claims that they
are discriminated against because of race and religion.
Victimization is an excuse offered by the state, by most politicians (right
and left) and by the mainstream media.
To avoid confrontation, all the politicians from the mainstream political
parties and all mainstream media are going along with the myth of
victimization. The problem is that this is only fueling more violence, more
terrorism and more fantasies of victimization.
French sociological research seems to have no new books, articles or ideas
about French Muslim radicalization. It is not hard to see why: the few
scholars tempted to wander off the beaten path ("terrorists are victims of
society, and suffering from racism" and so on) are afraid to be called
unpleasant names. In addition, many sociologists share the same Marxist
ideology that attributes violent behavior to discrimination and poverty. If
some heretics try to explain that terrorists are not automatically victims
(of society, of white French males, of whatever) a pack of hounds of Muslim
and non-Muslim scholars start baying to lynch them as racists, Islamophobes
and bigots.
After the November 2015, terrorist attacks in Paris, Alain Fuchs, president
of France's National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), launched a call
for a new project to understand some of the "factors of radicalization" in
France.
The project that emerged, "Youth and Radicalism: Religious and Political
Factors", by Olivier Galland and Anne Muxel, was thorough. Their survey is
based mainly on a poll conducted by Opinion Way of 7,000 high school
students, and was followed by a second "poll" of 1,800 young people (14 to
16 years old). The next phase will apparently include individual and group
interviews with young secondary-school students.
Galland and Muxel do not say that their survey is "representative" of all
French youth. Muslims high school students are over-represented in the
polls, in order to understand what is at stake in this segment of the
population.
Their proposal, however, is heretical: it means there is a problem with
Muslims.
The preliminary results of this vast study were released at a press
conference on March 20. To the question in the study: What are the main
factors of radicalization? The answer was: religion.
"We can not deny the 'religion effect'. Among young Muslims, the religion
effect is three times more important than in non-Muslim groups. Four percent
of youths of all denominations defend an absolutist vision of religion and
apparently adhere to radical ideas; this figure is 12% among young Muslims
in our sample. They defend an absolutist view of religion -- believing both
that there is 'one true religion' and that religion explains the creation of
the world better than science."
What about the usual explanations of lack of economic integration, fear of
being on welfare, social exclusion and so on?
"A purely economic explanation appears not to be validated. The idea of a
'sacrificed generation', tempted by radicalism, is confronted with the
feeling of a relatively good integration of these populations. [Young
Muslims] appear neither more nor less confident in their future than all
other French youths; they believe in their ability to pursue studies after
the baccalaureat and to find a satisfactory job."
These young Muslims recognize that they are not suffering from racism or
discrimination. But at the same time, many of them say they "feel"
discriminated against anyway. They are not the victims of any racist
system -- it does not exist -- but they are the victims of an ideology of
victimization, which claims that they are discriminated against because of
race and religion.
"The feeling of being discriminated against is twice as strong in our sample
especially among young people of Muslim faith or of foreign origin. To
explain the adherence [of young Muslims] to radicalism, we must consider
that religious factors are combining with identity issues, and mixing
themselves with feelings of victimization and discrimination".
If Islam is an engine of radicalization, the second powerful engine of
radicalization is this dominant ideology of victimization.
"Young Muslims who feel discriminated against adhere more often to radical
ideas than those who do not feel discriminated against."
These preliminary results are more than worrying. Against all sociological
evidence, social origin and academic level do not outweigh the effect of
religious affiliation. In other words, regardless of a young Muslim's
performance at school and his parents' profession, he is four times more
likely than a young Christian to adhere to radical ideas.
"This strength of the effect of Islam is perhaps the most surprising
teaching of this study," points out Olivier Galland. "This is confirmed in
school by school statistics. Whatever their sociology, Muslim youths have an
identical propensity to become a radical."
This study is not the first to bring to light the process of the
radicalization of young Muslims in France. It is, however, the first to
connect radicalization and the ideology of victimization. Victimization is
an excuse offered by the state, by most politicians (right and left) and by
the mainstream media. Moreover, not only does the policy of blaming
victimization fail to be of any help, but the excuse of victimization is
actually fueling terrorism. When, on February 17, 2017, French President
François Hollande rushed to visit Théo, a 22-year-old youth who claimed that
the police sodomized him with a baton during a confrontation with drug
dealers -- it appeared later that Theo was not so sure of his accusations
against the police. The presidential visit was not helpful. The meeting
between President Hollande and Theo sparked three weeks of riots in the
suburbs of Paris.
When Emmanuel Macron, the new president of France, states that he is in
favor of "positive discrimination" (a €15,000 grant of public money for any
company that hires a youth from the suburbs), he is encouraging future
jihadists to represent themselves as victims.
When Emmanuel Macron, the new president of France, states that he is in
favor of "positive discrimination", he is encouraging future jihadists to
represent themselves as victims. (Image source: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty
Images)
France has Europe's largest Muslim community, largest Jewish community,
largest Chinese community, and largest Armenian community. The French
integration model worked for all those groups except one. A growing
percentage of Muslims in France are not accepting the rules that everyone
else has accepted. To avoid confrontation, all the politicians from the
mainstream political parties and all mainstream media are going along with
the myth of victimization. The problem is that this is only fueling more
violence, more terrorism and more fantasies of victimization.
Yves Mamou, author and journalist, based in France, worked for two decades
as a journalist for Le Monde.
Follow Yves Mamou on Facebook
by Yves Mamou
May 18, 2017 at 5:00 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10134/france-islamic-victimization
They are not the victims of any racist system -- it does not exist -- but
they are the victims of an ideology of victimization, which claims that they
are discriminated against because of race and religion.
Victimization is an excuse offered by the state, by most politicians (right
and left) and by the mainstream media.
To avoid confrontation, all the politicians from the mainstream political
parties and all mainstream media are going along with the myth of
victimization. The problem is that this is only fueling more violence, more
terrorism and more fantasies of victimization.
French sociological research seems to have no new books, articles or ideas
about French Muslim radicalization. It is not hard to see why: the few
scholars tempted to wander off the beaten path ("terrorists are victims of
society, and suffering from racism" and so on) are afraid to be called
unpleasant names. In addition, many sociologists share the same Marxist
ideology that attributes violent behavior to discrimination and poverty. If
some heretics try to explain that terrorists are not automatically victims
(of society, of white French males, of whatever) a pack of hounds of Muslim
and non-Muslim scholars start baying to lynch them as racists, Islamophobes
and bigots.
After the November 2015, terrorist attacks in Paris, Alain Fuchs, president
of France's National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), launched a call
for a new project to understand some of the "factors of radicalization" in
France.
The project that emerged, "Youth and Radicalism: Religious and Political
Factors", by Olivier Galland and Anne Muxel, was thorough. Their survey is
based mainly on a poll conducted by Opinion Way of 7,000 high school
students, and was followed by a second "poll" of 1,800 young people (14 to
16 years old). The next phase will apparently include individual and group
interviews with young secondary-school students.
Galland and Muxel do not say that their survey is "representative" of all
French youth. Muslims high school students are over-represented in the
polls, in order to understand what is at stake in this segment of the
population.
Their proposal, however, is heretical: it means there is a problem with
Muslims.
The preliminary results of this vast study were released at a press
conference on March 20. To the question in the study: What are the main
factors of radicalization? The answer was: religion.
"We can not deny the 'religion effect'. Among young Muslims, the religion
effect is three times more important than in non-Muslim groups. Four percent
of youths of all denominations defend an absolutist vision of religion and
apparently adhere to radical ideas; this figure is 12% among young Muslims
in our sample. They defend an absolutist view of religion -- believing both
that there is 'one true religion' and that religion explains the creation of
the world better than science."
What about the usual explanations of lack of economic integration, fear of
being on welfare, social exclusion and so on?
"A purely economic explanation appears not to be validated. The idea of a
'sacrificed generation', tempted by radicalism, is confronted with the
feeling of a relatively good integration of these populations. [Young
Muslims] appear neither more nor less confident in their future than all
other French youths; they believe in their ability to pursue studies after
the baccalaureat and to find a satisfactory job."
These young Muslims recognize that they are not suffering from racism or
discrimination. But at the same time, many of them say they "feel"
discriminated against anyway. They are not the victims of any racist
system -- it does not exist -- but they are the victims of an ideology of
victimization, which claims that they are discriminated against because of
race and religion.
"The feeling of being discriminated against is twice as strong in our sample
especially among young people of Muslim faith or of foreign origin. To
explain the adherence [of young Muslims] to radicalism, we must consider
that religious factors are combining with identity issues, and mixing
themselves with feelings of victimization and discrimination".
If Islam is an engine of radicalization, the second powerful engine of
radicalization is this dominant ideology of victimization.
"Young Muslims who feel discriminated against adhere more often to radical
ideas than those who do not feel discriminated against."
These preliminary results are more than worrying. Against all sociological
evidence, social origin and academic level do not outweigh the effect of
religious affiliation. In other words, regardless of a young Muslim's
performance at school and his parents' profession, he is four times more
likely than a young Christian to adhere to radical ideas.
"This strength of the effect of Islam is perhaps the most surprising
teaching of this study," points out Olivier Galland. "This is confirmed in
school by school statistics. Whatever their sociology, Muslim youths have an
identical propensity to become a radical."
This study is not the first to bring to light the process of the
radicalization of young Muslims in France. It is, however, the first to
connect radicalization and the ideology of victimization. Victimization is
an excuse offered by the state, by most politicians (right and left) and by
the mainstream media. Moreover, not only does the policy of blaming
victimization fail to be of any help, but the excuse of victimization is
actually fueling terrorism. When, on February 17, 2017, French President
François Hollande rushed to visit Théo, a 22-year-old youth who claimed that
the police sodomized him with a baton during a confrontation with drug
dealers -- it appeared later that Theo was not so sure of his accusations
against the police. The presidential visit was not helpful. The meeting
between President Hollande and Theo sparked three weeks of riots in the
suburbs of Paris.
When Emmanuel Macron, the new president of France, states that he is in
favor of "positive discrimination" (a €15,000 grant of public money for any
company that hires a youth from the suburbs), he is encouraging future
jihadists to represent themselves as victims.
When Emmanuel Macron, the new president of France, states that he is in
favor of "positive discrimination", he is encouraging future jihadists to
represent themselves as victims. (Image source: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty
Images)
France has Europe's largest Muslim community, largest Jewish community,
largest Chinese community, and largest Armenian community. The French
integration model worked for all those groups except one. A growing
percentage of Muslims in France are not accepting the rules that everyone
else has accepted. To avoid confrontation, all the politicians from the
mainstream political parties and all mainstream media are going along with
the myth of victimization. The problem is that this is only fueling more
violence, more terrorism and more fantasies of victimization.
Yves Mamou, author and journalist, based in France, worked for two decades
as a journalist for Le Monde.
Follow Yves Mamou on Facebook